Archive for February, 2009

Why use a Material Handling Systems Integrator?

Friday, February 27th, 2009

 

The definition of a material handling systems integrator would be a best described as a combination of both an allied products distributor and a consultant.  Where a consultant takes a fee based approach for their intellectual property and then assists in vendor selection, and an allied products provider is selling his brand against the competition, a true systems integrator provides the sales and implementation of material handling products as well as the intellectual property to properly engineer the solution. 

If a company has no in-house engineering the decision to use a systems integrator is fairly straight forward.  You are hiring an industry expert to advise and solve warehousing and distribution issues.  The decision becomes more difficult when the company has engineering resources.  Material handling projects are often over simplified, devaluing the role an integrator plays. 

Don’t underestimate the difficulty in implementing a truly integrated material handling system and diminish the value of an integrator.

A systems integrator:

·     Performs data analysis and system design

·     Validates the solution

·     Aids in vendor justification and selection

·     Procures the product at the best price

·     Installs the system; many times in a working environment (your operation never stops)

·     Commissions the system

 

Every day, an integrator is designing and implementing material handling projects.  The real issue is not so much about a company’s capability to handle these projects as much as it is about the risk associated with them.  Companies with engineering talent usually have an understanding of warehousing and distribution processes.  But even to the savviest of customers, integrators can add value by bringing a wide variety of experience to projects and uses that experience to mitigate risk.

Risks are often underestimated and can vary greatly depending on the type of project.  For instance, installing a system in a greenfield (new/empty warehouse) vs. an existing operation that needs to continue to operate during implementation are two dramatically different risk scenarios. 

Why use an Integrator?

·    Single point of responsibility

·    Performs various consulting functions

·    Is not a distributor.  Provides an independent evaluation of the most appropriate solution to a customer’s issues

·    Manages and coordinates multiple vendors and technologies for smooth installation

 

As projects become more complicated, the value of a systems integrator increases.

Don’t undervalue an integrators role.  Overruns on budget or schedule translate into escalating costs, both on the project and lost opportunity.

Payback: Labor vs. Technology Costs

Tuesday, February 17th, 2009

Material handling technology is positively impacting the way we store and distribute product.  Implementing technology solutions reaches beyond lowering costs and increasing work flow, companies also benefit from improved customer service, more accurate shipping, faster response time and lower liability of workplace incidents. 

Warehousing and distribution functions have always been considered as nothing but a corporate cost center, a necessity for doing business.  But in today’s global economy, competition is driving margins continually downward and you can only raise prices so much before you out pace the market.  It is for this reason that companies must look at any area where costs can be reduced without sacrificing their quality or service levels.  By reducing your distribution costs you add net dollars to the bottom line, effectively creating a profit center from what once was a cost center. 

The most significant cost factor in any warehousing or distribution operation is labor.  And it is labor that should drive the return on investment (ROI) analysis prior to any decision as to whether or not to purchase technology.  Salary, benefits, training, insurance and the transient nature of the typical warehouse employee are all costs that exist in perpetuity…They never go away! 

So, why do companies hesitate to spend money on technology, opting to increase labor instead?  Many times it is because labor costs come out of an operating budget where technology comes from a capital expenditure budget.  Distribution center managers, who request funds for technology, have difficulty persuading upper management that the expense is justifiable.  If they hire more workers, the added expense is less scrutinized.  The mentality is, “We’re doing more business, so we need more people to get the product out the door…that’s understandable.  Frankly, I’m glad we’re doing so well!”  It’s not an irrational perspective.  However, companies must eventually realize that spending money for operational improvements and depreciating them over time can be much less expensive and improve effectiveness in the long run. 

 

Let’s look at a theoretical example: 

·         Picking orders in a paperless environment can  generate picking rates of between approximately 50 and 200 picks per hour, per operator based on the density of the pick locations and concentration of picks (i.e. 6 items of product A vs. 2 items each of A, B and C). 

So…

·         30 employees picking at 200 picks per hour (high end of the range) could pick 48,000 lines per day.

·         Each employee makes $14.00 / hr + benefits; 25% of salary (basic health, workman’s compensation and liability) = $17.50 / hr.

·         30 employees, 2080 hrs/year at $17.50/hr = $1,092,000 per year in salary costs.

·         A Pick-to-Light process which visually directs the picker to a location and directs the pick requirements can generate conservative rates from 300 picks per hour and up depending on pick density.

·         At 300 picks per hour it would take only 20 workers to pick 48,000 lines in an 8 hour shift.  (48,000/300/8)

·         A small system of 2500 lights where one light is assigned to each location would average around $250.00 per light including all fixed costs would be $625,000

·         Saving 10 employees = $364,000 in savings per year

·         Payback would be less than 2 years.  This cost is reduced by the use of one light bar to cover 2 sku positions (above and below); your payback would be less than one year.

 

Keep in mind that this only covers the direct costs.  Operationally, moving to a pick-to-light system increases the ease in training new employees, allows for a greater pick zone to be created, reduces employee turnover by simplifying the picking operation and improves picking accuracy to rates above 99.5%

 

Bottom line:  Sometimes you have to spend money to make money.

 
 

 

Protecting Your Rack

Monday, February 2nd, 2009

 

Protecting Your Rack

Rack is an expensive asset.  Even with steel prices at a low point, a rack system still represents a large percentage of your warehouse investment.  When you make that investment, you want to protect it.  Unfortunately it is common practice to overlook protection for your investment on the basis of cost.  This is a slippery slope.  Protection is inexpensive as a percentage of your total rack project.  Don’t forget that the cost to repair or replace damaged uprights and beams will quickly justify the upfront cost of protection.

What kind of protection is available?

  1. Rack guards – There are many types of guards available on the market, from individual upright protection to end of row protection.  They come in all shapes and sizes and should be tailored to the type of lift truck your operation employs.
    1. Post protector – Comes in many varieties, mostly rounded or angled to deflect impacts.  Comes in a variety of material including steel and plastic
    2. End of row – Protects the entire width of the upright, usually curved around the front of the upright at the entry point of the aisle
    3. Bollard – Multi-functional free standing post to create a protection barrier
    4. Guard rail – Is used in a number of manners.  It can be used to create a safe walk way for pedestrian traffic or to protect sensitive equipment that is exposed to potential truck damage
  2. Driver training/responsibility – Making sure that your drivers are well trained and understand that there are consequences to poor performance can be a great deterrent.
  3. Shock Switches – These are modules that are installed on your lift trucks that will disable the truck if it impacts anything.  The only way to enable a truck is to have a supervisor do so.  This will make sure that your drivers are more conscientious as the work in the warehouse.